Posts Tagged ‘Ethics’
Business Ethics and Unethical Practices

The study of business ethics and its implications for different stakeholders have seen tremendous growth in the past few decades. There has also been a rise in the use and development of codes of ethics and announcements for ethical practices by many firms; however companies are still criticized for their unethical practices at different levels (Papers4you.com, 2006). Business ethics, according to the literature has been entrenched with the philosophical details of Ethics (Trevino & Nelson, 1999). Ethics has been defined as ‘the activity of examining the moral standards of a society, and asking how these standards apply to ones life and whether these standards are reasonable’ (Velasquez, 1998; p. 11).
The literature on business ethics is divided on its views about the motivation and reason for businesses to have an ethical dimension. Drawing upon Harrison (2001), there are two major schools of thoughts, firstly those who suggest that firms are profit generating institutions and therefore business ethics is yet another way to attract customers, secondly those who support corporate conscience and intrinsic motivation for the adoption of business ethics.
Business ethics has been considered very subjective in nature and according to Paul (2001) is considered a function of time and culture. It has been established that with the passage of time business ethics have evolved and also that the cultural values and norms drive business ethics within national and regional boundaries. One of the major studies regarding the national values has been conducted by Hofstede (1983). According to this research, which was only based on four indicators i.e. individualism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance and masculinity, there is a great deal of differences among values across different nations and consequently the business ethics. Globalization combined with standardization has made businesses financially efficient but at the same time poses questions regarding the standardized codes of business ethics across national boundaries.
Vinten (1991) has divided the business ethical issues at different levels i.e. international business, domestic business and professional ethics. At the international level ethical issues include free-masonry and socialism versus capitalism; at domestic level these include religious dimensions, social marketing and ethical education; and lastly at the individual level these include bribery, corruption and data protection (Papers4you.com, 2006).
Ethics of Legal Profession

Synopsis:
Ethics of Legal Profession
Introduction
The profession of law is honourable, and its members are expected to act in an honest and upright manner, and any deviation from these elementary principles is liable to e dealt with severely.
An advocate practising law is under a triple obligation:
An obligation to his clients to be faithful to them till the last, an obligation to the profession not to besmirch its name by anything done by him, and an obligation to the court to be and to remain a dependable part of the machinery through which justice is administered. It is beyond the scope of treatise on legal ethics to describe the aims and uses of examinations of witnesses or to state the rules as to how evidence shall be recorded. In examining witnesses the advocate should not forget that he is not merely the counsel of client but also an officer of the Court to further the ends of justice. Similarly, the advocate should maintain towards his opponent utmost cordiality. Clients and not counsels are litigants. The ill-feelings between clients should not be allowed to influence the conduct of their counsel. Says Daniel Webster: “lawyers on opposite sides of a case are like the two parts of shears, they cut what comes between them, but not each other”
In the same way, Law being a fraternity, the profession is entitled to loyal support of its members in the maintenance of this tradition. There are certain duties of advocates towards his profession also; like, professional courtesy, co-operation, equal consideration to all members of the profession, encourage junior brethren, should stand up for its dignity and privileges whenever there is occasion for it, he should expose corrupt or dishonest conduct in the profession. Similarly advocates should also owe certain duties towards his colleagues which is analysed in subsequent pages.
In the words of Chief Justice Marshall has observed;
“the fundamental aim of Legal Ethics is to maintain the honour and dignity of the Law Profession, to secure a spirit of friendly co-operation between the Bench and the Bar in the promotion of highest standards of justice, to establish honourable and fair dealings of the counsel with his client opponent and witnesses ; to establish a spirit of brotherhood in the Bar itself ; and to secure that lawyers discharge their responsibilities to the community generally.”
Airline Ethics

Introduction
Ethics are essential in the Airline industry because they are the framework that guides individuals in the process of making business decisions. They usually encompass three features i.e. an application of one’s professional skills, incorporation of one’s personal values and lastly, good judgment. Codes of ethics are formal declarations of the moral values that guide various companies. Therefore, in the field of ethics, one can analyze an industry such as an Airline industry through its practical implementations and also through its formal declarations.
Ethical guidelines
Conflict of interest as part of ethical guidelines/code of conduct
Almost all Airline companies have formal declarations of their codes of ethics. Usually, this can be categorized under a series of topics such as conflict of interest, asset protection and working together. Conflict of interest refers to those scenarios where employees or company representatives have to decide between their interests to their employer or their personal/investment/ relationship obligations. Usually, most Airline companies have highlighted some of the issues that can be labeled conflict of interests in their ethics code of conduct. (Frontier airlines, 2004)
For instance, conflict of interest comes about when Airline personnel receive gifts or rewards from suppliers/ consumers/ stakeholders for doing their job. Usually, most Airlines prohibit gifts especially when those gifts seem excessive. The reason behind this is that when a client gives an attendant an expensive piece of jewelry for receiving very good customer service, that attendant may be obliged to meet the consumer’s demands the next time the client reports even when those demands are not procedural. This is because by accepting lavish gifts, one puts himself/herself in a position where they feel obligated to meet the gift giver’s needs and this eventually compromises their moral obligations.
Conflict of interest may also occur when a member of staff finds that they have to work extremely hard with certain clients and they request those suppliers/clients for rewards for their services. This is a conflict of interest because an employee finds that they have to choose between maintaining a good name for their Airline or meeting their personal financial interests. Consequently, it becomes necessary for Airlines to clarify that this is a wrong thing.
ROI of Ethics and Compliance: Can You Measure It?

What measures would you use to measure the ROI of your company’s ethics and compliance program? At the ECOA’s “Great Debate,” the debate focused on whether or not the ROI of an ethics and compliance program could be measured. Debater information and their arguments are listed below, followed by a summary of my feelings related to the issues. Steve Priest and Jay Mumford (the debaters) debated the topic of what justifies the existence- and budget, of an ethics and compliance department. Some of the opinions expressed during the debate included that there’s a lack of empirical evidence to support determining the ROI of ethics and compliance, measuring the return through legal fees and fines avoided due to an ethics and compliance program and whether or not ethics and compliance proves that a company is better than another.
Here are my notes from the debate. Please note that each person was assigned a side in the debate, therefore, the people involved were defending the side they were assigned and not necessarily their personal opinions on the matter.
Argument from Steve Priest
Founder of the Ethical Leadership Group, Senior Advisor at Global Compliance.
Argument- Emphasizing ROI for ethics and compliance is problematic for your business.
Ethics program- goal is to help the company be more ethical. Contribute to an organization’s health, leading to improved employee engagement, trust, less EEOC claims and commitment- not necessarily the bottom line on an accounting sheet.
Can’t justify that a company that acts ethically performs better than a company that does business in a conniving way.
No empirical evidence to support the statement that ethics pays.
Despite the evidence, the speaker believes that ethics pays- along with most other businesses.
An ethics and compliance program must be sincere- if a company makes a commitment to ethics and compliance purely because they believe E&C is profitable.
When codes and training are viewed as “check the box” support from the workplace decreases.
Would you gut the E&C department because it can’t provide financial proof that it makes business better?
Ethics means that companies must always do the right thing, even if it is difficult, and costly, making it hard to prove it brings a profit to the business.
Argument from Jay Mumford
Ethics and compliance director at Accenture.
Argument- Ethics and compliance ROI is real in its value, adequate to make the case to senior management to support ethics and compliance.
The Neverending Battle: Ethics and Money

The pressure for companies to develop effective ethics and compliance programs continues to grow as legal developments force companies to take greater responsibility for their actions.The ethics and compliance department must compete with every other group in the organization for funding. In many cases, all that the top level decisions makers want to hear is about how ethics and compliance can save the company money – proving that it’s not just a cost centre. In times when organizations are careful with their money, it’s often decided that doallrs are better spent elsewhere than ethics and compliance. I don’t agree with this decision, as there’s a lot more to the benefits ethics and compliance brings to the table. To help ethics and compliance departments plead their case to decision makers, there’s been a push, demanding that the DOJ release information on the role of ethics and compliance when deciding the fate of a company during a legal battle.
Effectiveness of Ethics and Compliance Programs
The Ethics Resource Centre, Ethics and Compliance Officer Association and the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics teamed up to prepare a report for the DOJ. The focus of the report was to get the DOJ to provide more information about the role of ethics and compliance programs in enforcement decisions. In a press release issued by the ERC, it states:
“Ethics and compliance practitioners seek data from the U.S. Department of Justice that identifies how often an effective ethics and compliance program yields a direct return in enforcement decisions, according to a survey jointly conducted by the ERC, ECOA and the SCCE. We welcome the recent efforts by the DOJ to publicize cases where it has rewarded companies for having strong ethics and compliance programs, but the ethics and compliance community challenges the Department to take steps to be even more forthcoming with information.”
The press release also includes a list of some of the different types of data that ethics and compliance professionals would like to see the DOJ report. The list includes:
Descriptions—without identifying information—of individual cases in which ethics and compliance programs were a mitigating factor in enforcement decisions.
Information about what specific aspects of an ethics and compliance program factored into enforcement decisions.
Information about the benefits of an effective ethics and compliance program, such as helping avert a decision to prosecute or avoidance of other sanctions such as appointment of a monitor.
Money Matters
Ethics and Feminism Articles

What do we mean by ethics?
The word ethics comes from a Greek source meaning custom or habit. Ethical philosophy involves the study of right and wrong. Sometimes people use the word morality instead of ethics. Both morality and ethics are about finding out how we ought to live. Ethics is a major branch of philosophy. (The other branches being: epistemology or knowledge, metaphysics or the essential nature of things and logic or reason.
Approaches to Ethics
There are four possible ways of approaching ethics.
Descriptive ethics: involves the description of how things are or the customs of a society.
Normative ethics: is about making moral decisions or deciding what is right and what is wrong. There are two main ways of doing this, namely by intentions or moral rules relating to duty (deontological ethics) or by outcome (teleological).
Meta-ethics; this approach analyses the nature of ethics. It includes both realism and antirealism. Realism is the view that moral values can be discovered, possibly by using intuition. Antirealism is the view that morality is determined by people’s thoughts and feelings
Applied ethics: this is how ethical values may be used in specific circumstances. So for example, the study of abortion would involve an individual applying moral theory to the situation of abortion. In order to do this they may draw on both normative values those of meta-ethics.
Normative Ethics In More Detail
Teleological Theory
Teleological theory is also known as consequentialism and involves outcomes. One example of teleological theory is utilitarianism. According to this theory one should do what creates the most happiness for the greatest number of people. However utilitarians are divided about what happiness is. Some claim that happiness is simply pleasure but others claim it is about minimising pain. Two major exponents of utilitarianism are Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.
Jeremy Bentham produced the felicific calculus, or hedonic calculus. For Bentham one could calculate the actual amount of pleasure over pain using a sort of mathematical method. The calculus involves taking into account factors such as: intensity, duration and certainty of pleasure.
John Stuart Mill divided pleasure into higher and lower order, claiming cultural, spiritual and intellectual pleasures to be higher order in nature.
Ethics in Business ? From Compliance to Commitment

By the time this article goes to print all of us will surely have had our fill of news reports about Conrad Black’s infamous lawsuit. We’ll likely be numb to the never ending allegations of fraudulent practices at Nortel. But, how many of us as human resource professionals will be asking, ‘What does this have to do with me?’
It seems that, by and large, human resource professionals have been quite happy to have the accountability for their company’s business ethics and code of business conduct rest with their legal or audit departments. In so doing, human resource professionals miss an opportunity to help their companies shift from merely being compliant with the law to demonstrating their company’s firm and unwavering commitment to build an ethical business culture.
The ‘iceberg model’ helps us to better appreciate the influences that may undermine a company’s policies and practices with respect to business ethics. Think of the ‘the Law’ and your company’s Code of Business Conduct Policy as the tip of the iceberg, visible above the surface. Now, think about the influences that exist below the surface lurking within many companies. Things like:
· Pressures to conform (“Hey, we always take off early Friday afternoons, you need to join us or else someone’s going to take notice”)
· Desire to please (“I picked up the tab for a lunch I had with my boss. He told me it was the only way he could expense it without needing to get further approval. I did it because I wanted to stay on his good side!”)
· Accepted practices (“Don’t worry, we give box seat tickets to all our clients and they sure don’t have any problem with accepting them!”)
· Performance drivers (“Hey, maybe we should just alter our numbers a bit. If we do, we’re sure to be in the top category for a bonus this year!”)
When asked, most of us do not hesitate to say that we are ‘ethical’. In fact some people are offended when asked to sign a document confirming they have read and understood their company’s Code of Business Conduct Policy. However, what we fail to recognize and appreciate is our ability to rationalize our own behavior. Sometimes we justify our actions so convincingly that we no longer even perceive that what we are doing is inherently wrong or unethical. For example:
Inculcation of Ethics Through Education and Globalization Effects on Ethics

Inculcation of Ethics Through Education and Globalization
Effects on Ethics
INTRODUCTION
‘The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government’………….. Thomas Jefferson.
‘When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist’……………..Dom Helder Camara.
Now we are living in the technological modern world. Science and Technology have a prominent role in the development of the any nation in the world. India is a developing county in the world. Indian economy is the fourth largest economy in the world. According to 2001 census the literacy rate of India is 64.84%. It is very less when compared to developed county in the world. The Planning Commission made a survey for finding out the number of persons below poverty line and estimated that 18.96% of the total peoples live below poverty line as of the year 1993-94. It is necessary to take care about poor and illiteracy.
ETHICS
Ethics is a major branch of philosophy, encompasses right conduct and good life. It is significantly broader than the common conception of analyzing right and wrong. A central aspect of ethics is “the good life”, the life worth living or life that is satisfying, which is held by many philosophers to be more important than moral conduct. The major problem is the discovery of the summum bonum, the greatest good.
Ethics are related to institutions and rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and human rights accordingly stem from ethics even if no moral grounds can be adduced. Yet moral grounds are to be found everywhere, including science. From the point where, in the name of ethics, science itself does not fall outside this domain, morals, similarly, do not lie outside the realm of ethics as ethics are a profoundly human, secular construction in so far as they represent a conscious choice or plan and a legal endeavour in terms of the law. The confusion that exists between rights and values on the one hand and between morals and ethics on the other lie at the heart of the debate on universal ethics, that is to say, universal ethics based on recognition of human rights.
